I find the situation at Penn State to just be sad. It is sad all around. The child abuse that took place at the school
is sad. The fact that the school created
an environment that allowed the abuser to continue to victimize children is
sad. The fact that the people that knew
what happened- from the janitor to the school President and chose to ignore the
abuse is sad. And the protests that are
now occurring over the fallout from this terrible situation are sad.
I think that the public reaction to the firing of the
beloved JoePa at Penn State is quite interesting. This man turned a blind eye to the sexual
abuse of children that occurred in his program- in his locker room. Sure, he alerted his superiors, but he did
not seek to stop the abuse. And that is
wrong. More children were harmed because
of his inaction. He valued his
friendship with the abuser more than the safety of children. And yes, there must be consequences to his
poor decision. I understand that he has
given so much of his talent and life to Penn State, but, nevertheless, his terrible
lapse in judgment that perpetuated this situation needs to be addressed. I think the trustees are justified in
removing him from his position. But the
public seems to disagree. Many think he
should keep his job. Many think the
trustees are being too harsh. Many don’t
understand why the coach’s misjudgment has cost him his storied career.
This situation reminds me of another child sex abuse scandal
that has a much different reaction from the public. The Catholic Church has been rocked by this
very situation. There have been Priests
who have taken advantage of their trusted positions and committed similar
crimes. Like the volunteer coach at Penn
State, there have been Priests who have sexually assaulted children. And in some of those cases, their superiors
did not do enough to stop it. They did
not do enough to protect future victims.
When the public got wind of these crimes, they were outraged. They wanted some one’s head on a
platter. The fall out has included not
only the justified removal and prosecution of the abusive Priests, but also the
resignation of many top level church leaders such as Cardinal Law of the Archdiocese
of Boston. But some think that this is
not enough. Some think that the Pope
should pay for these crimes. Some want
his head on a platter. Now, don’t get me
wrong. I am not trying to belittle the
public’s outrage in their reaction to this terrible crime. I think they should be mad. I think this reaction is justified. I disagree with people who paint all Priests
with the sex abuser brush, but I do think that the public is justified in their
anger. And good things have come from
this situation for the Church. Thanks to
this scandal, the Safe Environment programs developed by dioceses have never
been more comprehensive. The children
and vulnerable adults the Catholic Church serves have never been safer.
So, my question is, how is the situation at Penn State
different that the situation in the Catholic Church? I know that at Penn state
we are just talking about one abuser and there were many more than one in the much
larger community of the world-wide Catholic Church over a longer period of time. But the crime is the same. In both cases, the abuser was allowed to
continue to victimize due to the negligence of his superiors. So why does a football coach get a reprieve from
the public while all Catholic Priests must wear a scarlet A? Why does a football coach’s justified firing
anger the same public that wants the pope’s head on a platter? I don’t get it.